Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry. An alleged targeted discriminatory hate crime in progress by the Law Society of NSW

This short video shows how 12 grounds in our judicial review proceedings were conceptualised into a single question in the judgment of Acting Justice Griffiths of the NSW Supreme Court (a similar approach appears in Mr Bryl’s judgment). That question does not reflect any of our pleaded grounds. It was never raised by either party, never argued, and never ventilated. Yet, it appears as the central framing of the judgment.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same regulatory bodies, Law Society of NSW contrary to the disciplinary framework mandated by the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Raises serious concerns about due process, procedural fairne

A formal notice was submitted to the Office of Premier of NSW, Chris Minns, raising serious concerns about alleged unlawful and corrupt conduct by legal regulatory and public officials in New South Wales. These allegations point to systemic failures within key regulatory bodies overseeing the legal profession, including the Law Society of NSW's Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC).

Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths. For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground

Piper Alderman: A Portrait with Contradictions. An image speaks volumes about the contradictions within the legal profession. Andrea Beatty, partner Piper Alderman since 2018, " is widely published and her authorships include the leading consumer law text Annotated National Credit Code (LexisNexis)" whilst the same firm assist Credit Corp to record fictitious credit contracts in its claims, perverting the Credit Laws. Natalie Miller impersonated solicitor whilst unqualified

Odtojan Bryl Public Statement in Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s LinkedIn Post Our first-hand lived experience of these councillors’ conduct in the Law Society of NSW Council demonstrates that Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s self-serving description of them as “principled and caring” could not be further from the truth. This is our response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s call to re-elect the same group of five councillors, including herself, to the Law Society of NSW Council. With the excepti

Unlawful Retaliatory Acts by the Law Society of NSW – How Lawyers Who Act Lawfully Can Be Stripped of Their Livelihood. Unlawful Retaliatory Acts by the Law Society of NSW – Views of “Unfitness” Without Case or Process 1. The Core Facts The Law Society of NSW, through its Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, had no case. Instead of initiating proper proceedings under Chapter 5 of the Uniform Law, it invoked unfettered section 45 powers without lawful foundati

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. For those wondering what the NSW legal regulators did to lawyers, Marie Odtojan & Artem Bryl and their law firm, this image speaks volumes. Here’s a brief Q&A answered directly by the lawyers. Q: Did you have any prior adverse records or convictions? What did you breach? A: No. Neither of us had any prior adverse records, nor did we breach any professional obligations.

The recent announcement of self-nomination for re-election of the same council members within the Law Society of NSW is deeply troubling. Despite being under police investigation and the subject of a formal call for criminal investigation addressed to the NSW Premier, President Jennifer Ball and her fellow council members have carried on as though none of it exists, failing to disclose these serious and relevant matters to the legal community and the public.  Instead of stepp