Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry. An alleged targeted discriminatory hate crime in progress by the Law Society of NSW

This short video shows how 12 grounds in our judicial review proceedings were conceptualised into a single question in the judgment of Acting Justice Griffiths of the NSW Supreme Court (a similar approach appears in Mr Bryl’s judgment). That question does not reflect any of our pleaded grounds. It was never raised by either party, never argued, and never ventilated. Yet, it appears as the central framing of the judgment.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same regulatory bodies, Law Society of NSW contrary to the disciplinary framework mandated by the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Raises serious concerns about due process, procedural fairne

A formal notice was submitted to the Office of Premier of NSW, Chris Minns, raising serious concerns about alleged unlawful and corrupt conduct by legal regulatory and public officials in New South Wales. These allegations point to systemic failures within key regulatory bodies overseeing the legal profession, including the Law Society of NSW's Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC).

Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths. For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground

Unlawful Retaliatory Acts by the Law Society of NSW – How Lawyers Who Act Lawfully Can Be Stripped of Their Livelihood. Unlawful Retaliatory Acts by the Law Society of NSW – Views of “Unfitness” Without Case or Process 1. The Core Facts The Law Society of NSW, through its Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, had no case. Instead of initiating proper proceedings under Chapter 5 of the Uniform Law, it invoked unfettered section 45 powers without lawful foundati

The recent announcement of self-nomination for re-election of the same council members within the Law Society of NSW is deeply troubling. Despite being under police investigation and the subject of a formal call for criminal investigation addressed to the NSW Premier, President Jennifer Ball and her fellow council members have carried on as though none of it exists, failing to disclose these serious and relevant matters to the legal community and the public.  Instead of stepp

Law Society's False Records. Corrupt Officers acting in self-interest and self-preservation. Targeting and retaliating against 2 lawyers to strip them unlawfully of their practising rights without due process or lawful determination. Fraud by NSW Legal Regulators. A legal Crisis within the NSW Legal industry and profession.

We Won’t Be Silenced. The NSW Law Society's unlawful, corrupt acts exposed.They’re called to self-report and resign. Why are they still in office?

Law Society of NSW created an unlawful process to silence two innocent solicitors. a comparison of the Uniform law with the Law Society unlawful process. Rule of law. Legal Regulator unlawful and corrupt conduct.