Judicial Accountability | odtojanbryllawyers

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund challenges two Judicial Commission decisions in proceedings against the NSW Attorney-General and the Judicial Commission. The decisions concern the dismissal of her complaint against Chief Judge Michael Allen and the subsequent referral of concerns about her own conduct to the Commission's Conduct Division. These proceedings concern the dismissal of Freund's complaint against Chief Judge Michael Allen and, following the NSW Att

Legal Services: Commercial Business, Family Law, Commercial & Civil Litigation, Property Conveyancing, Contracts & Credit Laws, Employment, Defamation, Wills, Probate & Estates.

Consultations are available online via Zoom.

Areas serviced: Sydney CBD, Parramatta, Hills District, Greater Sydney, Greater Western Sydney, QLD & ACT.

Featured Posts

Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl Serious concerns lawyers and practising certificates

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

Photograph of NSW Attorney General Michael Daley undermining parliamentary findings against the NSW DPP as a "stitch up", "unsupported by evidence"and "farcical" while his office introduced prior misconduct allegations against two NSW lawyers where no findings existed.

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Marie Odtojan looking in a mirror — the Odtojan Mirror Test Theory: if you would not accept this process applied to yourself, you cannot defend its application to anyone else.

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On - No Findings, No Adjudication, Just Allegations | Marie Odtojan Artem Bryl Odtojan Bryl Lawyers

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court landmark decision in Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd.

Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law

Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl

A formal notice was submitted to the Office of Premier of NSW, Chris Minns, raising serious concerns about alleged unlawful and corrupt conduct by legal regulatory and public officials in New South Wales. These allegations point to systemic failures within key regulatory bodies overseeing the legal profession, including the Law Society of NSW's Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC). This post provides the correspondence to the NSW Premier highlighting the urgent need for reform and a royal commission to restore public trust, protect the legal profession’s integrity, and uphold the rule of law.

Unveiling Misconduct: A Call for Reform and Royal Commission into NSW Regulatory Bodies

Search By Tags

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

We Care. We Listen.
We Achieve Results.

1300 680 040

1300 680 040

ODTOJAN BRYL

Lawyers

1300 680 040

Admin@OdtojanBrylLawyers.com.au

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

Featured Posts

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court landmark decision in Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd.

Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law

Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl

Unveiling Misconduct: A Call for Reform and Royal Commission into NSW Regulatory Bodies

Recent Posts

Search By Tags

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court landmark decision in Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd.

When a NSW Supreme Court Judge Is Sued, It Highlights a Fundamental Principle: No One Is Above the Law.

Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law

Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl

1300 680 040

1300 680 040

ODTOJAN ​​​BRYL

Lawyers​

1300 680 040

Admin@OdtojanBrylLawyers.com.au

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

Featured Posts

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court landmark decision in Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd.

Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law

Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl

Unveiling Misconduct: A Call for Reform and Royal Commission into NSW Regulatory Bodies

Recent Posts

Search By Tags

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court landmark decision in Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd.

When a NSW Supreme Court Judge Is Sued, It Highlights a Fundamental Principle: No One Is Above the Law.

Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law

Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl

ODTOJAN BRYL

Lawyers