

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?
The Most Honest Test Anyone can Apply
"Take the process applied to two lawyers. Turn it around. Apply it to the people who applied it. Ask: would that be acceptable? This is the mirror test, and the reflection is revealing. There is a test that can cut through every legal argument, every procedural justification, and every institutional defence faster than any case authority.
It is called the mirror test.


One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.
One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer. Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl - Odtojan Bryl Lawyers. Two lawyers. A Law Firm. No findings. No proven case of any breaches under the law. No adjudication. Still speaking. Still fighting for the rule of law and democracy.


NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl
NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl
Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same regulatory bodies, Law Society of NSW contrary to the disciplinary framework mandated by the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Raises serious concerns about due process, procedural fairne


Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of the Grounds and Submissions
Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths.
For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground


Odtojan Bryl Public Statement - A Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s Self-Nominations for Re-election of the Law Society of NSW Council: Following Councillors' Alleged Unlawful Conduct
Odtojan Bryl Public Statement in Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s LinkedIn Post
Our first-hand lived experience of these councillors’ conduct in the Law Society of NSW Council demonstrates that Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s self-serving description of them as “principled and caring” could not be further from the truth.
This is our response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s call to re-elect the same group of five councillors, including herself, to the Law Society of NSW Council. With the excepti


Erin Patterson sentenced - Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done.
Erin Patterson sentenced to life in prison with a non-parole period of 33 years. This case is a reminder of the importance of the administration of justice. That Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done. The Rule of Law demands that power be exercised through due process.
In criminal law, the judge has the power to impose life imprisonment, but cannot act on power alone. There must be due process, a hearing, tested evidence & a judgment before sentencing. Sa



































