Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.
This short video shows how 12 grounds in our judicial review proceedings were conceptualised into a single question in the judgment of Acting Justice Griffiths of the NSW Supreme Court (a similar approach appears in Mr Bryl’s judgment).
That question does not reflect any of our pleaded grounds. It was never raised by either party, never argued, and never ventilated. Yet, it appears as the central framing of the judgment.
Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of the Grounds and Submissions
Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths.
For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground
Odtojan Bryl Public Statement - A Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s Self-Nominations for Re-election of the Law Society of NSW Council: Following Councillors' Alleged Unlawful Conduct
Odtojan Bryl Public Statement in Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s LinkedIn Post
Our first-hand lived experience of these councillors’ conduct in the Law Society of NSW Council demonstrates that Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s self-serving description of them as “principled and caring” could not be further from the truth.
This is our response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s call to re-elect the same group of five councillors, including herself, to the Law Society of NSW Council. With the excepti
