One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.
One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer. Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl - Odtojan Bryl Lawyers. Two lawyers. A Law Firm. No findings. No proven case of any breaches under the law. No adjudication. Still speaking. Still fighting for the rule of law and democracy.
Allegations Weaponised to Strip Livelihoods: An Erosion of the Rule of Law
What This Public Disclosure is About
This article concerns what we allege is the weaponisation of unresolved allegations to strip two lawyers of their livelihood, practising rights, and professional standing despite there being:
* no findings of misconduct or unsatisfactory professional conduct;
* no NCAT proceedings;
* no suspension;
* no tribunal determination;
* and no adjudicated findings of wrongdoing by any court or tribunal. It concerns what we allege was a gross mi
NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update - Odtojan and Bryl
NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl
Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same regulatory bodies, Law Society of NSW contrary to the disciplinary framework mandated by the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Raises serious concerns about due process, procedural fairne
Unveiling Misconduct: A Call for Reform and Royal Commission into NSW Regulatory Bodies
A formal notice was submitted to the Office of Premier of NSW, Chris Minns, raising serious concerns about alleged unlawful and corrupt conduct by legal regulatory and public officials in New South Wales. These allegations point to systemic failures within key regulatory bodies overseeing the legal profession, including the Law Society of NSW's Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC).
Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of the Grounds and Submissions
Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths.
For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground
Odtojan Bryl Public Statement: A response to the announcement of the self-nomination for re-election by compromised officers in the Law Society of NSW
The recent announcement of self-nomination for re-election of the same council members within the Law Society of NSW is deeply troubling.
Despite being under police investigation and the subject of a formal call for criminal investigation addressed to the NSW Premier, President Jennifer Ball and her fellow council members have carried on as though none of it exists, failing to disclose these serious and relevant matters to the legal community and the public.
Instead of stepp
Erin Patterson sentenced - Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done.
Erin Patterson sentenced to life in prison with a non-parole period of 33 years. This case is a reminder of the importance of the administration of justice. That Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done. The Rule of Law demands that power be exercised through due process.
In criminal law, the judge has the power to impose life imprisonment, but cannot act on power alone. There must be due process, a hearing, tested evidence & a judgment before sentencing. Sa
