This short video shows how 12 grounds in our judicial review proceedings were conceptualised into a single question in the judgment of Acting Justice Griffiths of the NSW Supreme Court (a similar approach appears in Mr Bryl’s judgment). That question does not reflect any of our pleaded grounds. It was never raised by either party, never argued, and never ventilated. Yet, it appears as the central framing of the judgment.

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same regulatory bodies, Law Society of NSW contrary to the disciplinary framework mandated by the Legal Profession Uniform Law. Raises serious concerns about due process, procedural fairne

A formal notice was submitted to the Office of Premier of NSW, Chris Minns, raising serious concerns about alleged unlawful and corrupt conduct by legal regulatory and public officials in New South Wales. These allegations point to systemic failures within key regulatory bodies overseeing the legal profession, including the Law Society of NSW's Professional Standards Department (PSD) and Council, and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC).

Odtojan & Bryl's Judicial Review Court Case: A Summary of Grounds & Submissions. Access to court submissions plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal process. Currently, the judicial review judgments are reserved. These proceedings were heard on 26 (Bryl) and 27 (Odtojan) November 2025 at the Supreme Court of NSW before the presiding acting Judge Griffiths. For those interested & following this case, this article provides the Plaintiffs' ground

Odtojan Bryl Public Statement in Response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s LinkedIn Post Our first-hand lived experience of these councillors’ conduct in the Law Society of NSW Council demonstrates that Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s self-serving description of them as “principled and caring” could not be further from the truth. This is our response to Ms Ereboni Yazdani’s call to re-elect the same group of five councillors, including herself, to the Law Society of NSW Council. With the excepti

Erin Patterson sentenced to life in prison with a non-parole period of 33 years. This case is a reminder of the importance of the administration of justice. That Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done. The Rule of Law demands that power be exercised through due process. In criminal law, the judge has the power to impose life imprisonment, but cannot act on power alone. There must be due process, a hearing, tested evidence & a judgment before sentencing. Sa

Law Society's False Records. Corrupt Officers acting in self-interest and self-preservation. Targeting and retaliating against 2 lawyers to strip them unlawfully of their practising rights without due process or lawful determination. Fraud by NSW Legal Regulators. A legal Crisis within the NSW Legal industry and profession.

The Erosion of the Rule of Law. A danger to the Public, A Warning to All. Every lawyer and every person in NSW is in danger. The legal regulators, the Law Society of NSW and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC), have shown corrupt conduct: concealing misconduct, protecting judicial officers and practitioners reported for indictable offences, and targeting instead the very witnesses and victims who came forward.

Miles Condon SC, Nicolas Ford & Thomas Glynn: 3 lawyers who, for nearly 10 years, ignored their client’s basic requests for clarification of their legal services. In 2023, in their former client's leave to appeal of a DC interlocutory orders before the NSW Court of Appeal, Justices Mark Leeming and Jeremy Kirk and John Basten and Richard White recorded evidence and representations on for the said Defendant lawyers who never appeared in court nor gave evidence.

When Lies in the Legal System Become a House of Cards: The Imperative of Truth in Justice. In the realm of law, every sworn statement, every legal instrument, and every court judgment rests on a single, fragile foundation: trust...