top of page

We Care. We Listen.
We Achieve Results.

odtojan bryl lawyers

1300 680 040

1300 680 040

odtojan bryl lawyers

ODTOJAN BRYL

Lawyers

1300 680 040

Admin@OdtojanBrylLawyers.com.au

Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten and a Half years: Consent, Power and the Rule of Law.

Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten and a Half years: Consent, Power and the Rule of Law. On 9 November 2026, Brand was sentenced to ten and a half years for rape and sexual assault offences. The offences occurred between 2004 and 2009, highlighting the enduring importance of accountability and procedural fairness.

Legal Services: Commercial Business, Family Law, Commercial & Civil Litigation, Property Conveyancing, Contracts & Credit Laws, Employment, Defamation, Wills, Probate & Estates.

Consultations are available online via Zoom.

Areas serviced: Sydney CBD, Parramatta, Hills District, Greater Sydney, Greater Western Sydney, QLD & ACT.

Featured Posts

Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl Serious concerns lawyers and practising certificates

Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl Serious concerns lawyers and practising certificates

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten and a Half years: Consent, Power and the Rule of Law.

Australia Announces New AI Regulator with Powers to Impose Significant Penalties

Australia Announces New AI Regulator with Powers to Impose Significant Penalties

Australia Announces New AI Regulator with Powers to Impose Significant Penalties

UPDATE | Freund v Attorney General of NSW -Court of Appeal Judgment, 30 October 2026

UPDATE | Freund v Attorney General of NSW -Court of Appeal Judgment, 30 October 2026

UPDATE | Freund v Attorney General of NSW -Court of Appeal Judgment, 30 October 2026

Sharon Freund v Attorney General of NSW & Judicial Commission - Update on the NSW Court of Appeal Hearing of 27 October 2026

Sharon Freund v Attorney General of NSW & Judicial Commission - Update on the NSW Court of Appeal Hearing of 27 October 2026

Sharon Freund v Attorney General of NSW & Judicial Commission - Update on the NSW Court of Appeal Hearing of 27 October 2026

“Perverting the Course of Justice and Lying”: NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund's Declaration in Her Complaint Against Chief Judge Michael Allen - Two Conflicting Judicial Accounts

“Perverting the Course of Justice and Lying”: NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund's Declaration in Her Complaint Against Chief Judge Michael Allen - Two Conflicting Judicial Accounts

“Perverting the Course of Justice and Lying”: NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund's Declaration in Her Complaint Against Chief Judge Michael Allen - Two Conflicting Judicial Accounts

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

Photograph of NSW Attorney General Michael Daley undermining parliamentary findings against the NSW DPP as a "stitch up", "unsupported by evidence"and "farcical" while his office introduced prior misconduct allegations against two NSW lawyers where no findings existed.

Photograph of NSW Attorney General Michael Daley undermining parliamentary findings against the NSW DPP as a "stitch up", "unsupported by evidence"and "farcical" while his office introduced prior misconduct allegations against two NSW lawyers where no findings existed.

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Marie Odtojan looking in a mirror — the Odtojan Mirror Test Theory: if you would not accept this process applied to yourself, you cannot defend its application to anyone else.

Marie Odtojan looking in a mirror — the Odtojan Mirror Test Theory: if you would not accept this process applied to yourself, you cannot defend its application to anyone else.

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On - No Findings, No Adjudication, Just Allegations | Marie Odtojan Artem Bryl Odtojan Bryl Lawyers

One Year On - No Findings, No Adjudication, Just Allegations | Marie Odtojan Artem Bryl Odtojan Bryl Lawyers

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

Recent Posts

Search By Tags

Law Society of NSW unlawfully prevents the legitimate renewal of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's practising certificates without lawful process and deleted their solicitors records in the LS Registry

Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten and a Half years: Consent, Power and the Rule of Law.

Australia Announces New AI Regulator with Powers to Impose Significant Penalties

UPDATE | Freund v Attorney General of NSW -Court of Appeal Judgment, 30 October 2026

Sharon Freund v Attorney General of NSW & Judicial Commission - Update on the NSW Court of Appeal Hearing of 27 October 2026

“Perverting the Course of Justice and Lying”: NSW Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund's Declaration in Her Complaint Against Chief Judge Michael Allen - Two Conflicting Judicial Accounts

NSW Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund Challenges Two Judicial Commission Decisions in Court of Appeal

NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings

Odtojan's Mirror Test: What Would Happen If We Did This to Them?

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer.

bottom of page