NSW Attorney General Called Parliamentary Findings a "Stitch-Up" and "Farcical" - Yet His Own Office Introduced "Prior Misconduct" Allegations With No Findings
NSW Attorney General Michael Daley undermining parliamentary findings against the NSW DPP as a "stitch up", "unsupported by evidence"and "farcical" while his office introduced prior misconduct allegations against two NSW lawyers where no findings existed.
Judicial Review Judgment (NSW Supreme Court): 12 Grounds Reframed as one Question Not Ventilated.
This short video shows how 12 grounds in our judicial review proceedings were conceptualised into a single question in the judgment of Acting Justice Griffiths of the NSW Supreme Court (a similar approach appears in Mr Bryl’s judgment).
That question does not reflect any of our pleaded grounds. It was never raised by either party, never argued, and never ventilated. Yet, it appears as the central framing of the judgment.
