Disclaimer: The information provided below is supported by what transpired in the Sydney District Court and NSW Court of Appeal court proceedings; court transcripts, affidavits; representations and documents and legal resources (legislation, rules etc). The notice is subject to change and amendments as more information and documents may be made available.
SUMMARY
1. Odtojan Bryl Lawyers (OBL), Ms Marie Odtojan (Ms Odtojan) and Mr Artem Bryl (Mr Bryl) have been implicated and framed in the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCOA) leave to appeal judgements of Justices Mark Leeming and Jeremy Kirk (Mr Miles Condon SC case) and John Basten and Richard White (Mr Nicolas Ford and Mr Thomas Glynn case).
2. Ms Odtojan (a party to the proceedings, a victim and witness of the alleged fraud and improprieties of the three respondents below mentioned) and Mr Bryl (witness) has their profession as legal practitioners, and their law firm, OBL, implicated in the NSWCOA published judgments. Their profession threatened and used against them in Ms Odtojan’s personal civil tort-damages proceedings, commenced in Aug-Sept 2022. The cases are as follows:
a. Odtojan v Nicolas George Ford (DC 2022/00242555 ; NSWCOA 2023/131242) - Barrister of Edmund Barton Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Nicolas George Ford of Edmund Barton Chmabers
Legal representatives - Barrister: Mr Bernard Lloyd of of 9 Wentworth Chambers.
Solicitors: Mr Jonathan Newby and Mr John Georgas of Colin Biggers and Paisley.
Mr Ford's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
b. Odtojan v Thomas Patrick Glynn (DC 2022/00273977; NSWCOA 2023/131229) - Principal Solicitor of Glynns Lawyers, based in Tasmania - See Statement of Claim against Mr Thomas Patrick Glynn of Glynns Lawyers
Legal representatives - Barrister: Ms Anne Horvath SC of Banco Chambers.
Solicitors: Ms Elizabeth Lough and Mr Baron Alder of Moray & Agnew (NSWCA LAHearing), and former solicitors: Mr Nicholas Andrew and Ms Belinda Marshall of Barry Nilsson.
Mr Glynn's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
c. Odtojan v Mile Kevin Condon (DC 2022/00273980; NSWCOA 2023/103644) - Senior Counsel of New Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Miles Kevin Condon Senior Counsel of New Chambers
Legal representatives - Barristers: Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers.
Solicitors: Mr James Berg and Sarah Li Yee Lien of DLA Piper, Counsels Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers .
Mr Condon SC's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
3. OBL was never mentioned at the procedural hearings in the District Court and NSWCOA. Neither was Ms Odtojan's profession ventilated and raised as issue, yet OBL, and the profession of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl are recorded in the judgment making adverse comments and criticisms where Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl were never put squarely of the issues for them to answer in court. They were not heard on the matter. Such recordings in the judgments were done by ambush and is against the administration of justice and against judicial ethics and duties.
4. Justices Leeming and Kirk had used their office to search Ms Odtojan's other personal civil cases not related to Condon's case. An unrelated 2019 case was recorded in the judgment, by ambush. the 2019 case is a separate, different case against Credit Corp/Piper Alderman which raised serious issues of Piper Alderman backdating and changing their attendances in the invoices particularly changing Ms Natalie Miller's attendances, amongst many, where they changed the recorded attendance of Ms Miller 'instructing counsel' to 'attending conference' to cover up her conduct of impersonating a legal practitioner and misleading the court in the local court proceedings in 2016 that she was a lawyer. She was referred to as solicitor/instructing solicitor by Mr Sebastian Hartford-Davis when he was aware she was not a solicitor and encouraged her to sit at the bar table despite being an unqualified person. Ms Miller, had also touched and circled evidence and rendered it up a the final hearing before Magistrate Freund. This was by direction of Mr Hartford-Davis (court transcript 18 and 19 July 2016).
SEE THE FULL NOTICE VIA: PUBLIC NOTICE