Lawyers

Our Mission

Integrity. Quality. Care.

Client-Service and Solution Oriented.

Quality legal service to the utmost professional and ethical standard.

Objectives

Dedicated to quality service.
Efficient and cost-effective.
Tough on the problem, gentle on the people.
Continuous legal development and education.
Active involvement and leadership within the community.

Over a decade of on-going alleged fraud/improprieties by Credit Corp and its lawyers, Mr Carlos Toda of Certus Partners / Piper Alderman, which pertain to alleged indictable offences, administration of justice offences, impersonation of legal practitioners, concealment of criminality/improprieties, corruption, circumvention and contravention of the national credit laws, court rules/processes, which stem from the alleged original act by St George Bank of its non-compliance with the credit laws where it failed to form a credit card contract and provided an unsolicited credit card. The unsolicited penalties alone attract approx. $2.5M under the ASIC Act, payable to the Commonwealth of Australia. This is just one case of many.

This is a public interest case and such notice is given for the protection of the public and the integrity of the courts and the legal profession. See the full notice ==> Public Notice.

Magistrate charged of conspiracy and perverting the course of justice is struck off the roll of legal practitioners by SA Supreme Court.

Magistrate charged of conspiracy and perverting the course of justice is struck off the roll of legal practitioners by SA Supreme Court

OBL Public Notice - A case of Law against Corruption and Titles.

Odtojan Bryl Lawyers (OBL), Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl, have been implicated, framed and defamed in the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCA) Judgments.

PSA: White Collar Crime - Credit Corp and its lawyers in Australian Courts.

Over a decade of on-going alleged fraud/improprieties by Credit Corp and its lawyers, Mr Carlos Toda of Certus Partners & Piper Alderman....

The Rachael Gunn "Raygun" Olympic Breakdancing Debacle

The Raygun Olympic Break Dancing Debacle. How did this happen?

NSW District Court Judicial Registrar, James Howard, attempts to dismiss Plaintiff's three claims before claims are served on the Defendants and prior to parties being heard in Court.

Judicial Registrar, James Howard, attempts to dismiss Plaintiff's three claims before claims served on Defendants, before parties heard.

Fraud on the Court - Administration of Justice Offences - highest form of violation committed in courts.

Fraud on the Court / Administration of Justice Offences is the highest form of violation committed in the court.

Sydney Metro Compulsory Acquisition of Land

Bank forges loan application & repossesses a couples home.

Major Bank, CBA, repossesses a couples home, however later realises the husband's signature was forged and salary inflated on CBA...

Credit Corp unscrupulous conduct

Credit Corp, Piper Alderman

Thinking of buying a strata property?

If you're looking to buy strata property, whether as a home owner or as an investment, here are some tips from a Financial Review...

Say NO to violence!

Break the silence, educate, be proactive and share this knowledge. Violence is not only physical, it comes in various forms: emotional or...

Does the law of Provocation require reformation?

An inquiry into the ‘law of provocation’ may be imperative following some recent cases of defendants circumventing the charge of murder...

LEGAL SERVICES

Areas serviced: NSW, VIC, QLD & ACT.

Consultations are available online.

Family Law

Business & Property

Wills, Probate & Estates

Commercial & Civil Litigation

Property Settlement
Children
Divorce
Consent Orders
Mediation/Conferences
Court

Know More

Property Conveyancing
Sale/Purchase/Off the plan
Leases
Contracts
Negotiations
Dispute Resolution
Settlements

Know More

Drafting Wills
Enduring / Power of Attorney (EPOA/POA)
Enduring Guardianship
Grant of Probate
Administration
Court

Know More

Family Law
General Civil
Employment/Fair Work
Defamation
Credit & Consumer Laws
Court
Negotiations
Dispute Resolution

Know More

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

WHAT PEOPLE SAY

“ I definitely recommend Odtojan Bryl Lawyers. My husband and I had a legal situation that appeared to us to be getting very stressful and complicated. With one kindly worded letter, Ms Odtojan had the entire matter sorted out for us. Very grateful! ”

— April Davis, Ph.D.Scientist

Client - Dispute Matter

Buying or selling property?

Important Credit Consumer Resources - Credit Laws.
Know your rights.

Do you know that all financial consumer credit products in Australia are subject to strict credit laws and you have rights under national credit laws:

NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION ACT 2009 (NCCP)

NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT CODE (NCC)

ASIC ACT 2001

What the banks, debt collectors, and their lawyers neither want you to know nor exercise.

This toolkit does not provide a guide in relation to court proceedings.

Contact Odtojan Bryl Lawyers if you need legal advice/representation regarding credit-related dispute matters.

For financial institutions to consider pursuing a credit-related debt in court, such as a credit card debt, they must have a credit card contract (a regulated contract) compliant with the requirements under the Credit Laws and must provide a section 88 notice of a default under the terms of the said contract before they file a claim.

If the proceedings go to a final hearing, they must prove the cause of action, the default under the contract.

For more information visit: 'Credit Contract Laws Sydney Australia'

Download the Credit Law Toolkit updated 2018 ==>

Odtojan Bryl Lawyers brings public awareness of a serious issue of great public importance - that our court system is being used as a platform to circumvent the credit laws and obtain judgments without credit contracts hence not proving a cause of action (a default under the contract) which constitutes a fraudulent claim and perversion of the course of justice.

More information will be provided on how OBL principal discovered the systemic breaches of the credit laws by ASX listed company, Credit Corp Services Pty Limited (CCS), and its lawyers such as Carlos Toda and Piper Alderman Lawyers who files/signed a statement of claim pleading a credit card agreement/contract where no such contract exists.

(Sydney Local Court proceedings 2014/00219407 commenced by CCS).

Odtojan Bryl Lawyers have discovered that such conduct by CCS is prolific and systemic and likely spans decades based on the limited publicly available judgment CCS has obtained, where the cause of action (a default/breach under a credit contract) is not proved/determined.

Many claims provided to OBL by those affected by CSS have the same consistent issues reported, CSS refusing/deflecting to provide their pleaded contract under the claim, circumventing the credit laws, and engaging in misleading conduct by referring to non-contractual documents as a credit contract.

Click to Download

Affected by the Sydney Metro Compulsory Acquisition?

PUBLIC NOTICE

Disclaimer: The information provided below is supported by what transpired in the Sydney District Court and NSW Court of Appeal court proceedings; court transcripts, affidavits; representations and documents and legal resources (legislation, rules etc). The notice is subject to change and amendments as more information and documents may be made available.

SUMMARY

1. Odtojan Bryl Lawyers (OBL), Ms Marie Odtojan (Ms Odtojan) and Mr Artem Bryl (Mr Bryl) have been implicated and framed in the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCOA) leave to appeal judgements of Justices Mark Leeming and Jeremy Kirk (Mr Miles Condon SC case) and John Basten and Richard White (Mr Nicolas Ford and Mr Thomas Glynn case).

2. Ms Odtojan (a party to the proceedings, a victim and witness of the alleged fraud and improprieties of the three respondents below mentioned) and Mr Bryl (witness) has their profession as legal practitioners, and their law firm, OBL, implicated in the NSWCOA published judgments. Their profession threatened and used against them in Ms Odtojan’s personal civil tort-damages proceedings, commenced in Aug-Sept 2022. The cases are as follows:

a. Odtojan v Nicolas George Ford (DC 2022/00242555 ; NSWCOA 2023/131242) - Barrister of Edmund Barton Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Nicolas George Ford of Edmund Barton Chmabers

Legal representatives - Barrister: Mr Bernard Lloyd of of 9 Wentworth Chambers.

Solicitors: Mr Jonathan Newby and Mr John Georgas of Colin Biggers and Paisley.

Mr Ford's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.

b. Odtojan v Thomas Patrick Glynn (DC 2022/00273977; NSWCOA 2023/131229) - Principal Solicitor of Glynns Lawyers, based in Tasmania - See Statement of Claim against Mr Thomas Patrick Glynn of Glynns Lawyers

Legal representatives - Barrister: Ms Anne Horvath SC of Banco Chambers.

Solicitors: Ms Elizabeth Lough and Mr Baron Alder of Moray & Agnew (NSWCA LAHearing), and former solicitors: Mr Nicholas Andrew and Ms Belinda Marshall of Barry Nilsson.

Mr Glynn's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.

c. Odtojan v Mile Kevin Condon (DC 2022/00273980; NSWCOA 2023/103644) - Senior Counsel of New Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Miles Kevin Condon Senior Counsel of New Chambers

Legal representatives - Barristers: Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers.

Solicitors: Mr James Berg and Sarah Li Yee Lien of DLA Piper, Counsels Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers .

Mr Condon SC's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.

3. OBL was never mentioned at the procedural hearings in the District Court and NSWCOA. Neither was Ms Odtojan's profession ventilated and raised as issue, yet OBL, and the profession of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl are recorded in the judgment making adverse comments and criticisms where Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl were never put squarely of the issues for them to answer in court. They were not heard on the matter. Such recordings in the judgments were done by ambush and is against the administration of justice and against judicial ethics and duties.

4. Justices Leeming and Kirk had used their office to search Ms Odtojan's other personal civil cases not related to Condon's case. An unrelated 2019 case was recorded in the judgment, by ambush. the 2019 case is a separate, different case against Credit Corp/Piper Alderman which raised serious issues of Piper Alderman backdating and changing their attendances in the invoices particularly changing Ms Natalie Miller's attendances, amongst many, where they changed the recorded attendance of Ms Miller 'instructing counsel' to 'attending conference' to cover up her conduct of impersonating a legal practitioner and misleading the court in the local court proceedings in 2016 that she was a lawyer. She was referred to as solicitor/instructing solicitor by Mr Sebastian Hartford-Davis when he was aware she was not a solicitor and encouraged her to sit at the bar table despite being an unqualified person. Ms Miller, had also touched and circled evidence and rendered it up a the final hearing before Magistrate Freund. This was by direction of Mr Hartford-Davis (court transcript 18 and 19 July 2016).